← Modern Machine-Shop Practice, Volumes I and II
Chapter 6
Number and Sizes of Templates
With a given pitch every additional tooth increases the diameter of the wheel, and changes the form of the epicycloid; so that it would appear necessary to have as many different cutters, as there are wheels to be made, of any one pitch.
But the proportional increment, and the actual change of form, due to the addition of one tooth, becomes less as the wheel becomes larger; and the alteration in the outline soon becomes imperceptible. Going still farther, we can presently add more teeth without producing a sensible variation in the contour. That is to say, several wheels can be cut with the same cutter, without introducing a perceptible error. It is obvious that this variation in the form is least near the pitch circle, which is the only part of the epicycloid made use of; and Prof. Willis many years ago deduced theoretically, what has since been abundantly proved by practice, that instead of an infinite number of cutters, 24 are sufficient of one pitch, for making all wheels, from one with 12 teeth up to a rack.
Accordingly, in using the epicycloidal milling engine, for forming the template, segments of pitch circles are provided of the following diameters (in inches):
12, 16, 20, 27, 43, 100,
13, 17, 21, 30, 50, 150,
14, 18, 23, 34, 60, 300.
15, 19, 25, 38, 75,
In Fig. 106, the edge t t is shaped by the cutter t t, whose centre travels in the path r s, therefore these two lines are at a constant normal distance from each other. Let a roller p, of any reasonable diameter, be run along t t, its centre will trace the line u v, which is at a constant normal distance from t t, and therefore from r s. Let the normal distance between u v and r s be the radius of another milling cutter n, having the same axis as the roller p, and carried by it, but in a different plane as shown in the side view; then whatever n cuts will have r s for its contour, if it lie upon the same side of the cutter as the template.
The diameter of the disks which act as describing circles is 7⁄2 inches, and that of the milling cutter which shapes the edge of the template is ⁄8 of an inch.
Now if we make a set of 1-pitch wheels with the diameters above given, the smallest will have twelve teeth, and the one with fifteen teeth will have radial flanks. The curves will be the same whatever the pitch; but as shown in Fig. 106, the blank should be adjusted in the epicycloidal engine, so that its lower edge shall be ⁄16th of an inch (the radius of the cutter m) above the bottom of the space; also its relation to the side of the proposed tooth should be as here shown. As previously explained, the depth of the space depends upon the pitch. In the system adopted by the Pratt & Whitney Company, the whole height of the tooth is 2⁄8 times the diametral pitch, the projection outside the pitch circle being just equal to the pitch, so that diameter of blank = diameter of pitch circle + 2 × diametral pitch.
We have now to show how, from a single set of what may be called 1-pitch templates, complete sets of cutters of the true epicycloidal contour may be made of the same or any less pitch.
Now if t t be a 1-pitch template as above mentioned, it is clear that n will correctly shape a cutting edge of a gear cutter for a 1-pitch wheel. The same figure, reduced to half size, would correctly represent the formation of a cutter for a 2-pitch wheel of the same number of teeth; if to quarter size, that of a cutter for a 4-pitch wheel, and so on.
But since the actual size and curvature of the contour thus determined depend upon the dimensions and motion of the cutter n, it will be seen that the same result will practically be accomplished, if these only be reduced; the size of the template, the diameter and the path of the roller remaining unchanged.
The nature of the mechanism by which this is effected in the Pratt & Whitney system of producing epicycloidal cutters will be hereafter explained in connection with cutters.