Peritonitis

BY ALONZO CLARK, M.D., LL.D.

Italian physicians in the later years of the seventeenth century and in the early ones of the eighteenth had acquired some knowledge of the symptoms of the disease we now call peritonitis, but known to them as inflammation of the intestines. Indeed, it is claimed by some of the admirers of Hippocrates that there are passages in his writings that indicate some knowledge of the disease. But this claim will probably be always received with many doubts as to its validity.

In confirmation of the first statement I will transcribe certain passages from Morgagni's thirty-fifth letter: In inflammation of the intestines "Albertini had observed the pulse to be low and rather weak, such as you will find it to have been in general in the foregoing letter under Nos. 9, 11, 18, and 25." He also observed the abdomen to be tense and hard, the face and eyes to have something unusual in their appearance. "Medical writers, indeed, agree in the tension of the abdomen, but they add many other symptoms, which prove beyond a doubt the intestines to be inflamed; yet they mean that evident inflammation which all may easily ascertain, and not that obscure disorder which we now speak of, and which few suspect" (gangrene of the intestines). "By the same writers it is also supposed that there is an obstinate costiveness and continual vomiting."

Morgagni refers to the assistance rendered by Albertini, Valsala, Van Swieten, Rosa, and others in elucidating this subject. It is singular, considering the clearness of his perception of the symptoms of inflammation of the intestines, that he should be so greatly confused regarding gangrene and sphacelus of the same parts. He looks on these as the result of inflammation, and when the two classes of cases are considered and compared, the result is a contrast and not a resemblance. Yet he supposes that the differences are to be accounted for by the different modes in which the same disease may be developed in different persons.

Another thing obtrudes itself on the attention in these letters: that while a number of post-mortem examinations are reported of those who had died of inflammation of the intestines, of gangrene and sphacelus of the intestines, of hepatic abscess opening into the peritoneal cavity, there is no record of finding in the abdomen anything corresponding to what is now known as the inflammatory effusions from serous membranes.

Sydenham died in 1689. I have searched his works, not for peritonitis, for the word was not in use in his day, but for some account of inflammation of the intestines or of some disease in the description of which symptoms are named that distinguish or belong to peritonitis, and with the single exception of pain the search has been fruitless.

Cullen in 1775 mentions the disease, but says that so little is known about it that he will not attempt a description of it.

Bichat died in 1802 in the thirty-eighth year of his age. I am not able at present to lay my hand on his Pathological Anatomy; I therefore quote from Chomel's article on peritonitis in the Dictionnaire de Médecine to show his claim to important studies regarding that disease: "For a long time peritonitis was confounded under the name of inflammation du bas ventre with inflammations of the abdominal viscera; and it is to Bichat belongs the merit of having proved that inflammation of the peritoneum is a disease distinct, and that it ought to be separated from enteritis, gastritis, etc., as pleurisy is separate from pneumonia. The studies of Gasc and of Laennec soon confirmed the opinion of Bichat, and assured to peritonitis the important place which it ought to occupy in all nosological tables. It has become since then a subject of numerous observations and of interesting researches regarding the causes de sa marche and the lesions it causes."

The references are not given by Chomel, but they are probably these: Laennec, Histoire des Inflammations du Peritoine, 1804; and Gasc, Dictionnaire des Sciences Méd., p. 490, 1809.

Gasc says that the twenty years next preceding his publication witnessed the first stage of the true history of peritonitis. Walther in 1786 had contributed some facts, and S. G. Vogel in 1795, but the rounding off and completing their work was left for Bichat.